Nepal Newsbox
2082 Chaitra 18, Wednesday
Nepal Newsbox
Power, Family, and the Marginalization of Party Workers in Proportional Politics
Political Analysis
Power, Family, and the Marginalization of Party Workers in Proportional Politics
In contemporary Nepali politics, the proportional representation system increasingly appears less as a mechanism of inclusion and more as a tool for managing power. Senior party leaders often use the PR route to avoid electoral risk or to secure parliamentary entry for their close associates and family members. This practice has created a deep structural imbalance within political parties.
Especially in major parties, decision-making over proportional lists is highly centralized. Grassroots workers who have contributed from local struggles to national movements are excluded, while those with personal or familial access to leadership move ahead. This weakens internal party democracy and severely damages the morale of long-serving cadres.
Lists formed in the name of Madhesi representation, women, Dalits, or marginalized communities increasingly circulate among a small circle of influential families and elites. Politics of representation is gradually being replaced by politics of access. This shift undermines not only the constitutional promise of inclusion but also the very idea of social justice.
From a political standpoint, this trend carries serious long-term risks. First, party workers become alienated from politics. Second, the culture of struggle and movement erodes. Third, democracy itself begins to revolve around a few families. When politics starts resembling inheritance, public trust inevitably collapses.
The time has come for bold reform. Political parties must establish public criteria for proportional selection, evaluate contribution and sacrifice, and ensure meaningful representation of grassroots workers. Otherwise, the proportional system itself risks becoming an anti-democratic structure.
Ultimately, the core question remains: Is politics a form of public service, or a system of inheritance? The answer will not emerge from silence, but from courage. Democracy moves forward not through favors, but through voices that dare to question.